House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan’s appointment of Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., to guide the antitrust subcommittee as an alternative of Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo., is inflicting some conservatives to query how efficient the Home shall be in reining in Massive Tech.
Jordan, R-Ohio, introduced final week that Massie would chair the Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust, which got here as a disappointment to Buck, who has been a frontrunner from the Republican facet on antitrust reform. Buck says Massie’s appointment is a sign to how Jordan plans to approach antitrust enforcement of Massive Tech firms.
“I used to be dissatisfied, however not shocked… when Jim informed me that I’d not be the subcommittee chair,” Buck mentioned in an interview with Fox Information Digital. Buck famous that Massie was not beforehand on the subcommittee and had voted in opposition to laws geared toward tightening antitrust enforcement on Massive Tech firms.
“I like Thomas, he is good friend and I want him one of the best, however it’s fairly clear that Jim decided on what course he wished the committee to go,” Buck mentioned.
HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE LEAK OF SUPREME COURT OPINION AFTER SCOTUS WHIFFS

Home Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, proper, and Rep. Ken Buck
(Tom Williams/Getty Photographs)
That course, Buck fears, is abandoning what he believes is a key element in addressing criticisms from each side of the aisle about Massive Tech going unchecked for anticompetitive habits.
BIG TECH HAWK SPEARHEADS ANTITRUST PACKAGE IN CONGRESS AIMED AT REINING IN ‘GOLIATH’ FIRMS’ PROWESS
“In my opinion, you want antitrust enforcement, you want Part 230 reform, and you could have a look at the privateness legal guidelines. And quite a bit has been written about all three and the influence that every one three would have on this space,” Buck mentioned. “To take antitrust off the desk is a mistake.”
A consultant for Massie didn’t instantly reply to Fox Information Digital’s request for remark, however Russell Dye, a spokesperson for Jordan, defended the choice to go along with Massie.
“Rep. Massie is without doubt one of the smartest minds in Congress and can work more durable than anybody on holding Massive Tech accountable,” Dye mentioned, including Jordan has mentioned repeatedly that every little thing is on the desk in terms of antitrust and holding Massive Tech accountable.
Nonetheless, some conservatives see Massie’s anti-antitrust historical past and libertarian strategy as a nasty signal. Jon Schweppe, director of coverage for the American Ideas Undertaking, mentioned Massie’s appointment, is a “step again” on antitrust enforcement.

Rep. Thomas Massie
(Getty)
“The Home is… on lockdown for the businesses proper now,” Schweppe mentioned.
Schweppe says he expects that payments just like the bipartisan Open Apps Market Act or the Competitors and Transparency in Digital Promoting Act – each of that are geared toward breaking apart the businesses’ most dominant verticals – shall be “a lot heavier lifts” within the Home.
Schweppe mentioned he hopes the Senate will “put the onus” on the Home by passing a kind of payments to place extra stress on Home Republicans to make a transfer.
A senior GOP aide echoed that sentiment to Fox Information Digital and mentioned there may be momentum within the Senate to probably ship a kind of measures to the Home.
REP. KEN BUCK PANS LATEST GOP BIG TECH TASK FORCE PROPOSAL: IT ‘DOESN’T GO FAR ENOUGH’
As to the worth of antitrust enforcement, the supply mentioned the facility is in focusing on Massive Tech firms’ market dominance, and that points like censorship – a central subject with conservatives – are straight associated to market dominance.

“To take antitrust off the desk is a mistake,” says Rep. Ken Buck.
(Home Judiciary Committee screenshot)
Mike Davis, president of the Web Accountability Undertaking and former chief counsel for nominations within the Senate, informed Fox Information Digital, “If Jim Jordan and Kevin McCarthy help antitrust reforms, it may get handed within the Home, handed within the Senate, and signed into legislation instantly.”
“The rationale Big Tech can censor, silence, de-platform, or cancel conservatives is as a result of they’ve monopoly energy,” Davis mentioned. “And so they use their monopoly energy to shutter small companies and crush competitors. Part 230 reform just isn’t going to move this Congress. Antitrust reforms can move if Kevin McCarthy and Jim Jordan get out of the way in which.”
“They’ve actually proven their playing cards right here by passing over Ken Buck,” Davis mentioned.